The text of Professor and especially to Lee LeFever struck me very much. I think it's happened to everyone in their school career did not understand some concept. The prof showed it at the beginning of the lessons available but then, any doubt, you limavano them to say "so why is it so." Then we go back to the bench with his tail between his legs, thinking it was better to impararselo memory and nothing else. In my opinion it is useless to fill the students with concepts empty notions in themselves that immediately after the query will end up in oblivion. Speaking in particular in science is important to be able to reason, to consider the context and, based on this, give meaning to a formula. I attended for two years the law school without any satisfaction, I did not give me peace to learn codes from memory, changing according to the opinion of chissacchì. An option gives much more scientific in this sense, everything has a very precise function there for a reason. In high school I used to repeat a very good professor, I was accustomed to manage themselves in front of a formula: I had read, understand clarify the context for the field where I was, then, rationally with these premises passed to the formula. It was very nice because every formula analyzed in this way was as if I had discovered I for the first time, I was there alone and come in stages, and those concepts will remain with me always. And 'this teaching to me.
I want to close with an incident happened in my class in high school: The
Prof. LB wants to explain the concept of cos (alpha)
Prof: "You can not split 'cos ' from '(alpha)' as 'Pig eva'! Saying 'd'eva' alone does not make sense !!!!!!!!!!!"
Pupil: "But to say 'pig' alone, however," Realize
0 comments:
Post a Comment