Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Milenavelbafree Movies

missed a very important book !!!!!!!!!!!!!



Important notice to all !!!!!!!!!! Today there was a meeting to discuss important changes to our policies, I put the summary, I believe that there is much to be angry !!!!!!


THEY WANT TO 90


All 'last Course Board Degree has been voted the rules for the allocation of voting theory. This assignment to date was not subject to any constraint, with the result that it has come to give up 14 points to certain claims, thus allowing to students with excellent averages do not reach the 110 and praise. The need for greater reliability and the need for a true meritocracy are obvious, but the direction taken by the Council was far too hard: the response to the request (playing by the teachers themselves) for just rules occurred in considerable lowering of the points to be assigned tesi.La the proposal that was voted by the majority, with only one vote against us students, was to put roof max of 7 points awarded by the jury in addition to the bonus 0.5 points to who was in Erasmus, 1 point if you end up in 6 years and 0.5 points if you end up in 7 years, 0, 1 point for every praise. This leads to the paradoxical situation in which even those who arrive with 28 media is unlikely to take 110, and those who arrive with an average of 26, which is not too bad in Medicine, comes out with a 102! Here is the correspondence between the average ratings of 6 years and maximum score you can hope to achieve ....


average of 23 -> 84 + 7 = 91 *


average of 24 -> 88 + 7 = 95


average of 25 -> 91.6 + 7 = 98.6


average of 26 -> 95.3 + 7 = 102


average of 27 -> 99 + 7 = 106


average of 28 -> 7 = 102.6 + 109.6


average of 29 -> 106.3


average of 30 -> 110


* (84 points are corresponding to the average of 23, in addition to a maximum of 7 points if you made a good argument plus various bonuses)


This rule should be in place for those who are currently in 4th year. Has not yet been confirmed, so we have some leeway to convince teachers to apply it to those who sign up next year to 1 year, so that there really is the transparency of which we keep hearing about! We believe it is unfair to introduce such a rule for those who have already completed most of his studies, and - Therefore - it is already defined as an average that takes him to a degree grade is too low!


Even worse has been proposed to tighten the block to the passage 4-5 year, which now provides the 'admission to five years in September if you have more than 15 credits to be recovered, with a subsequent block between semesters, which prevents those who have recovered eight of the previous 15 points to go to the second half, with the obligation of giving even within pharmacology febbraio.La new proposal to the 5th year that passes only those who passed in September Pharmacology and has left more than a review ... virtually none! Let's make the teachers do not remain deaf to the difficulties we meet, let's see who will lead us to vote for something that students lose years of money and time, without adding anything to our preparation! To clarify: The first part, which concerns the claim was approved but still have to vote the year of entry into force of riforma.La second part, the block of 4 th year to now is only a proposal by President R. Valanzano.
Collective of Medicine
CODE RED


Angry? If so, it seems to me to be! I'll try to keep the blog updated and if you have any questions, do it! Collective We're looking for a way to change things, join us!

0 comments:

Post a Comment